Balancing Act: Acquisition vs. Loyalty

It’s easier to keep a customer than to win a new one. That adage still holds in 2025. But so does another: if you’re not growing, you’re shrinking.

So where should marketers place their bets? The answer, unsurprisingly, lies in balance.

Many brands default to loyalty strategies, and for good reason. CRM lists offer rich, reliable data. Retargeting feels efficient. And loyal customers, the thinking goes, are more profitable. On paper, the metrics shine: higher conversion rates, cleaner attribution, and lower costs.

However, numbers that appear efficient don’t always indicate genuine growth. Retargeted audiences might have acted anyway. In that case, marketing doesn’t drive incremental revenue; it just takes credit for it. Over time, this can inflate performance metrics while masking stagnation.

And for categories with limited purchase cycles (think running shoes, mattresses, luxury watches), there’s only so much lift to be found in nudging loyal customers. At a certain point, squeezing the same lemon yields diminishing returns.

Focusing too heavily on loyalty can feel safe, but it’s often a comfort trap. Growth requires expansion—reaching new audiences, not just re-engaging old ones. Acquisition, by contrast, demands more patience and frequently larger budgets. It can look less efficient at first glance. Yet it’s the engine of sustained growth, building net-new relationships that compound over time.

The question marketers should ask is simple: are we optimizing for metrics that flatter us now, or strategies that grow us later? Real growth doesn’t always look efficient—but it’s the kind that lasts.

Next
Next

5 Tips to Amp Up Your Audio Advertising